Search for: "Delaware Opportunities, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2012, 9:54 pm by Gordon Smith
Delaware Vice Chancellor Laster issued a new corporate opportunity opinion yesterday, Dweck v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:00 am by Celia Taylor
” Fearful that such by-laws would chill litigation, on May 22, 2014, the Delaware Corporate Law Council proposed an amendment to the DCGL that according to the amendment’s synopsis is “intended to limit the applicability of [the Delaware Supreme Court decision in ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
., Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court finally addressed the longstanding debate over the validity of the Blasius doctrine. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:58 am
A recent Delaware Supreme Court order affirming the Court of Chancery’s ruling in Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:33 am by Mack Sperling
The parties were co-shareholders of Anthem Leather, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which was in the business of buying leather from tanneries and selling it to its customers for various uses. [read post]
NetSpend Holdings Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery found that the directors of NetSpend likely breached their Revlon duty to obtain the highest price reasonably available for stockholders by pursuing a single-bidder strategy for selling the company. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:34 am by JW Verret
I had the opportunity to present Treasury Inc.: How the Bailout Reshapes Corporate Theory and Practice at the American Association of Law Schools conference session on Business Associations in January. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:01 am by Carl Neff
(“Caesars”) wherein Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, solely in its capacity as successor trustee under the Indenture dated as of April 15, 2009, under which Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:07 am by Guhan Subramanian, Harvard Law School,
In contrast, in a line of cases beginning with the Delaware Chancery Court’s 2001 opinion in In re Siliconix Inc. [read post]
Apr. 3, 2020).In this post-trial opinion, the Court of Chancery found that Harpoon Therapeutics, Inc., (“Harpoon”), a Delaware corporation in the business of developing novel cancer therapies, fraudulently induced an investor into acquiring an interest in one of its business divisions by intentionally drafting a non-compete narrowly to exclude certain opportunities Harpoon wished to pursue, in contrast with its representations to the investor about its future… [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 5:00 pm by Celia Taylor
  By enacting a blanket prohibition on all fee shifting bylaws, Delaware misses an opportunity to craft a more nuanced approach. [read post]